Filter by Categories
Audit Reports
Awards
Blog
Calendar
Criminal Justice
Criminal complaints
Dossiers
Joint proceedings
Vetting
War crime trials
ICTY trials and before the courts in the other post-Yugoslav states
Before the internationalised courts in Kosovo
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Croatia
Montenegro
Transcripts
War crime trials in Serbia
Analysis
Individual Cases
Zone of (non)responsibility
Dajte potpis
Documentation
Dokumentovanje i pamcenje
Donatori
Education
Education
National School of Transitional Justice
Regional School of Transitional Justice
HLC Annual Report
HLC Archives
HLC Governing Board
HLC YouTube Channel
Human Losses
Data Base
Human Losses in Kosovo
Human losses in NATO bombing of Serbia and Montenegro
Human Losses in the armed conflict in Macedonia
Human losses of Serbia and Montenegro in the armed conflicts in Slovenia, Croatia and B&H
Kosovo Memory Book
Register of Croatian citizens of Serbian ethnicity, killed in the armed conflict in Croatia
Internships
Justice
Koalicija za REKOM
Kontakt
Linkovi
Memory
O nama
Others about HLC
Podcast
Pravda i reforma institucija
Public Information
Bulletin through ACCESSION towards JUSTICE
Conferences
HLC Video Production
Library
Magazine Forum on Transitional Justice
News
Press Releases
Reports
Transitional justice in focus
Video documents
Publications
Reparations
Financial Reparations
Symbolic Reparations
Reports on Transitional Justice
Search the Data Base of Human Losses of Serbia and Montenegro in the Period 1991-1995.
The RECOM Process
Transkripti
Uncategorized
Uncategorized @en
Vacancies
Video produkcija
19.03.2012.

Natasa Kandic: Courts rule on politicians’ orders

b92

Source: B92
Belgrade – Responding to a slander charge filed against her by the Chief of the General Staff, the Director of the Humanitarian Law Center, Natasa Kandic, says the lawsuit was expected and its nature is political. According to Kandic, the lawsuit against her is a consequence of this particular political moment in which no one wants to investigate the responsibility of individual generals for war crimes. In such context, the chapter on war crimes obviously closes with those who have been convicted so far.
“I actually expected the lawsuit to be filed even earlier, but it seems they needed more time to prepare what both the Prosecution and Minister Sutanovac spoke of with such ease,” said for B92 the Director of the Humanitarian Law Center.
When asked what would happen with the lawsuit which the HLC filed against Ljubisa Dikovic, the Chief of the General Staff of Serbia (the lawsuit had been submitted to the First Instance Court in Belgrade, and is based on the seven counts from the Dikovic File, the latter having been published in late January by the HLC), Kandic says she does not expect anything to happen, because the courts rule on behalf of politicians.

The spokesperson of the First Instance Court in Belgrade, Ivana Ramic, confirmed for B92 that Kandic’s lawsuit has been submitted to that court. 

“The fate of that lawsuit has already been sealed by what Minister Sutanovac said. He said, quite in advance, that the court would determine the File’s falsity. In other words, the court would determine that the data listed in the File did not match the facts. He obviously knew in advance what the facts were, and what the court would rule. So I personally expect that in this particular case the court, as Sutanovac stated, would confirm what one politician said before any facts have been examined,” said Kandic.

But she adds: “Some day a different political moment will come, when Minister Sutanovac’s words will be discussed in a different way. Then the question of the File will be reopened in the context of the facts presented in it by the HLC.”
Kandic said that the opinion of the War Crimes Prosecution, according to which HLC’s charges against General Dikovic contain no elements that imply his responsibility for war crimes, is clearly a political decision.

“I think it is quite sufficient to assess the conclusion of the War Crimes Prosecutor’s Office in the context of the fact that they managed to produce this conclusion overnight, while it takes them many years to complete some investigations or to issue indictments. Even the Prosecutor Vukcevic said: ‘We have checked, as we were asked to.’ It is quite clear who asked them to check and what. Politicians requested that the War Crimes Prosecution confirm what they wanted – that no data existed that would imply criminal or political responsibility of General Dikovic,” she said.
“The response issued by the War Crimes Prosecution testifies quite strongly about this particular political moment. Our institutions contribute to political interpretations of how to deal with accountability for war crimes,” concluded the Director of the Humanitarian Law Center.

Tagovi:

Podržali:

Pogledajte još...

We use cookies to provide a better user experience and to enable the functioning of this presentation in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.